228,960 views
For contact: https://www.erikrauda.com/contacto MY DEFENSE STRATEGY. Most of my defenses are based on the argument of insufficient and/or deficient evidence (points 1 and 2), all focused on the fact that is the subject of the accusation and the obligation of the public prosecutor to prove it, hence cross-examination and rebuttal evidence are my main tools. As a general rule, I do not present any defense theory to the Trial Court, because I do not work with reasonable doubt (point 3) or with exclusive ones (points 5 and 6), since I do not consider it convenient to create an alternative fact to the accusation and thus force myself to prove it. Atypicality (point 4) for me is a matter of appeal or protection, since it is incompatible to defend by pointing out that the fact is not proven (point 1 and 2) and at the same time say that it is atypical. I am therefore waiting for the Judge to rule on the evidence of the facts, in order to subsequently object to the legal classification. I look forward to your comments and questions, and don't forget to share them.