15,759 views
We continue the series of materials about the peasant uprising of 1907, as part of the exhibition "Revisiting the peasant uprising of 1907". This time, we make a short foray into the literature dedicated to this event, with the help of the literary critic Cosmin Borza, researcher at the Institute of Linguistics and Literary History "Sextil Pușcariu" in Cluj-Napoca. "The most important literary impact of the 1907 Uprising consisted in the establishment of the dissociation between the rustic and the rural, that is, between the idyllic or picturesque processing of the image of the village/peasant (predominant throughout the 19th century, cultivated to excess by the grouping "planter" at the beginning of the 20th century) and the realistic reflection of peasant existence. For decades the rural universe had been mythologized by writers who adhered to conservative or liberal orientations, thus disguising the inability of the two ideologies to offer political or economic solutions for solving the so-called "peasant question". Only after the bloodiest uprising in modern Europe does the village finally come to be considered as the most suitable social environment to perceive and expose the effects of capitalist modernization to their true extent. The much praised political, social, economic and cultural process proves not only non-adherent, but downright destructive for over 80% of the inhabitants of the Kingdom of Romania. That metamorphosis of vision is expressed openly and even programmatically by many of the prominent writers of the age. By evoking On that day in March 1907, Mihail Sadoveanu completely reconsiders his vision of the peasantry: "Then you fully understood a great and painful thing and saw, with bitter sorrow, how foreign and distant I really was to the people I had dared to I approach with words of friendship".