5,154 views
Interview with Master's students in Sociology at the University of Paris Sorbonne, December 3, 2012. Should psychoanalysis, or the analyst's discourse, serve as a supplementary discourse to resolve current and future drifts in the social bond? Is psychoanalysis intended to position itself as a subversion of the dominant discourse? Does it not run the risk of being converted, or perverted, in turn, into a new discourse of mastery? Or can we, on the contrary, simply rely on psychoanalytic models of discourse, among other sources of inspiration, to construct a kind of clinical sociology? Should psychoanalysis therefore always position itself on the margins to leave room for other forms of discourse, even if it can contribute to creating and strengthening them? Site: http://www.germanarceross.com Blog: http://www.psychanalysevideoblog.com