12,647 views
Third edition of the guide on art. 176 of the Commercial Companies Code in a limited liability company - https://dziendobrypodatki.pl/jak-bezp... If you need legal and tax assistance in planning or implementing the process of transformation into a company, in entering eCIT, or in other legal or tax matters - fill out the short contact form here: https://dziendobrypodatki.pl/doradztwo Do you run an accounting office or are you a tax advisor, legal advisor, attorney? Check out the Dzień Dobry Podatki Club: https://www.dziendobrypodatki.pl/klub Recurring non-cash benefits - i.e. the famous art. 176 of the Commercial Companies Code - is a very popular way to withdraw funds from a limited liability company Without ZUS and health insurance contributions. Exactly - are you sure? For some time now, ZUS and the President of the National Health Fund have been questioning the meaning of art. 176 of the Commercial Companies Code in the interpretations they issue. On this occasion, in the latest episode of the Podcast, I answer the question - whether the implementation of art. 176 KSH in a limited liability company is still safe? How to approach the changed interpretation line of the authorities? Should we flee in panic or wait calmly? Episode 72 of the podcast - https://dziendobrypodatki.pl/art-176-... Episode 91 of the Podcast - https://dziendobrypodatki.pl/zus-kwes... Podcast website: http://www.DzienDobryPodatki.pl