297,499 views
In this comparison between formats we put the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda 3 face to face, that is, SUV format versus compact format. These two Mazda vehicles share a large number of elements, being practically identical in terms of manufacturing and totally identical in mechanics, equipment and interior finishes. To find the differences we have to look at the measurements, ease of access, interior space and trunk, but also at performance, consumption, behavior and price. In the end, the decision between SUV and compact should be made based on objective characteristics, with the SUV being larger, more comfortable and practical and the compact being cheaper, faster and with lower consumption. After the analysis, the conclusion is that it will be the price (very favorable to the compact) and the personal criteria of each person that decide the purchase decision between SUV and compact, beyond the data. 00:00 Intro 00:33 Car presentation 01:05 Dimensions 02:27 Trunks 05:00 Mazda 3 access 05:38 Mazda CX-30 access 06:32 Mazda 3 driving position 07:08 Mazda CX-30 driving position 7:33 Mazda 3 habitability 08:12 Mazda CX-30 habitability 08:46 Mazda 3 rear seat access 9:33 Mazda CX-30 rear seat access 10:26 Mazda 3 rear seat position 11:02 Mazda CX-30 rear seat position 11:35 Mazda 3 rear seats 12:43 Mazda CX-30 rear seats 15:25 Mazda 3 dynamics 17:00 Mazda CX-30 dynamics 19:57 Prices 20:39 Conclusions #mazda #suv #diariomotor Presented by David G. Artés Recorded and edited by Fernando Sanz We are also on: https://www.diariomotor.com Instagram: / diariomotor Facebook: / diariomotor Twitter: / diariomotor TikTok: / diariomotor.com