32,142 views
Look at the legal arguments of the 21st Criminal Circuit Judge with jurisdiction in Cali, to make the decision in law where the citizen Eduardo Córdoba Mendoza is acquitted of all charges. Weighted, measured and in accordance with the evaluation of the evidence. Observe how the judge makes an introduction, explaining to the public the reason for his decision. Then he goes on to evaluate what the parties brought to trial under the principle of immediacy, not failing to warn that in this system the parties have the burden of proving it or else he cannot build a ruling adverse to the interests of the one being judged. He emphasizes that the judge knows nothing of what could have happened, since obviously he was not there at the time of the occurrence of the fatal events. The Prosecutor has the burden of proving, he is the one who must bring the material elements of proof and the physical evidence to the oral trial, with all the rules on production, adduction of evidence. The prosecution brought these doubts to the oral trial, without resolving them. Without any proof, especially when the case was brought against him as a CO-AUTHOR OF AGGRAVATED MURDER AND POSSESSION OF FIREARMS. The appeal by the prosecutor and the victims' representative has no chance of success. I am more than sure that the collegiate body or the Superior Court of the judicial district will end up confirming the decision of the aquo.