138,326 views
In Who Will Take Power: Great Apes, Politicians or Robots, Pascal Picq gave this warning: if we are not able to understand the intelligence of great apes, then we will be in a bad position with artificial intelligence. So, is humanity about to be overtaken in what made it superior until now over animals and machines: intelligence? Since the disappearance of the last Neanderthals and the announced disappearance of the great apes, humanity has walled itself up in an arrogance that led it to believe that it had the prerogative of all intelligences. What is called "the awakening of AI" shakes this certainty based on too much ignorance. Why are we not able to understand other intelligences, animal or artificial? Because it is appropriate to admit that there is no animal intelligence as there would be an artificial intelligence. This essay traces the foundations of animal, human and artificial intelligence in an evolutionary approach. How did they emerge? How do they differ? How are some more efficient at solving this or that problem? Lack of knowledge about the evolution of intelligences and the invention of artificial intelligence creates uncertainties and concerns. In fact, they take reverse evolutionary paths. Machines do things that seem complicated to us more easily, such as playing chess or the game of go, than they are able to perform simple acts (for us), such as walking and jumping; this is the "Moravec paradox". From an evolutionary point of view, machines more easily perform tasks or actions recently invented by humans than those that appeared during our evolution. Pascal Picq is a paleoanthropologist. His research on the evolution of man focuses on its origins as well as the profound anthropological changes underway. His previous works, including Who Will Take Power? Great Apes, Politicians or Robots (2017), The Return of Mrs. Neanderthal (2015), From Darwin to Lévi-Strauss (2013) were great successes.