394 views
Pablo Semán is a sociologist and PhD in Anthropology. This book is based on research into the religiosity of the popular sectors in Argentina, which is still valid a couple of decades after it was carried out. Some questions: How does field research influence the construction of analyses of social phenomena in general and popular phenomena in particular? What tools were used in the work? Is the Catholic-Pentecostal co-presence, youth and political transversality still valid? Why do you think that these premonitory analyses, like others you did in the media, do not influence politics? The book closes by comparing the view with a microscope with the view with a telescope. Could you close the interview with that comparison?