00:00 Introduction 00:35 Stock spring 1.6 01:18 Top 1 (Spring 1.5) 01:54 Top 2 (Spring 1.8 MT) 02:48 Top 3 (Spring Sachs 1.8 CVT) 04:65 Top 4 (Diesel Sachs) 05:22 Top 5 (1.8 CVT) 05:58 Top 6 (Diesel) 06:42 Top 7 (Out HL) 08:33 Table with clearances The first spring in my top is, oddly enough, a spring from 1.5 4059256... Thickness 13.75, length 329 and stiffness 29 kg. For 1.6 MT, the increase in clearance will be 5..7 mm. For 1.6 AT, there will most likely be no increase in clearance. For 1.8 and 2.0 MT, there will be a slight lowering, literally by 5 mm. And for other trim levels, the spring will be too soft and the clearance may drop significantly, so it is not worth installing it. The second spring is from 1.8 MT, 4059260. Thickness 13.75, length 345 and rigidity 28 kg. For 1.6 MT, the increase in clearance will be 10 ... 15 mm. For 1.6 AT, the increase will be 5 ... 10 mm. For 1.8 and 2.0 MT, the increase will be about 5 mm, because the spring is new and since it is a replacement for the original, the manufacturer makes it a little stiffer than stock) For 1.8 and 2.0 on a CVT, the clearance will most likely be the same as stock, and over time it will drop by 5 mm, since the CVT is naturally heavier than the mechanics. And finally, for 2.0 and 2.4 on all-wheel drive, this spring will be too soft and the clearance can drop by more than 10 mm ... and there is no point in installing it ... The third spring in my top is the coolest spring! 993113 ZAKS. Its length is 328, it is the shortest of all standard springs available on the market! Thickness 14.5 and stiffness 32 and a half kg. Impressive numbers... It's cool because it can be installed on all Lancer trim levels) But there is a caveat) for light 1.6 like mine and slightly heavier 1.8 on mechanics, the spring is even excessive, you will forever forget what a broken suspension is, and on other trim levels, which are clearly heavier, it will simply be a good replacement for the stock if you need a compromise between clearance and performance... you certainly won't drive like in a rally, but it will definitely handle average and measured driving) For 1.6 MT, the increase in clearance will be 15 mm For 1.6 AT 10 mm For 1.8 and 2.0 on MT, the increase will be around 5 mm, because the weight of 1.8 or 2.0 MT and 1.6 AT is approximately the same... 1.8 and 2.0 weigh a little more) For 1.8 and 2.0 CVT, there will most likely be no increase in clearance, since the spring is initially short... Well, and finally, for all-wheel drive on 2.0 and 2.4 engines, and even with a CVT, there will be a slight lowering of about 5 ... 10 mm, but I repeat, the spring will cope in 80% of cases. The fourth spring from a diesel engine, 993114 ZAKS Thickness 14.5, length - 340 and rigidity 31.3 kg. This spring will already be more interesting than the previous one in terms of installation on heavy Lancers, on 2.4 with a CVT and all-wheel drive in terms of clearance. The fifth spring in my top is again a spring from a 1.8 CVT, but this time a Legiforce, 4059257… Thickness 14.25, length 335 and stiffness 33.7 kg/cm. I repeat that this spring should also be used only on heavy Lancers if the previous diesel one seems weak to you… The clearance will also be about standard, perhaps even with a slight increase, by about 5 mm… The sixth spring is again from a diesel Lancer and again a Legiforce 4059261… Thickness 14, Length – 350, stiffness 30 kg. A very specific spring, I recommend it extremely rarely, and there are only a couple of positive reviews, but nevertheless they exist) This person installed it on his 1.8 liftback with a CVT, and received an increase of 15 mm, but the ground clearance remained the same as the 165 suspension, because he replaced the struts with 150s, such simple mathematics ... And on super-heavy Lancers, the increase will be about 5..10 mm. Well, finally, our finalist! The seventh spring in my top! Meet! The fattest spring for the Lancer! 4059252, spring from the Outlander XL Thickness 15 mm Length 331 and stiffness 40 kg ...