107,102 views
Examining Trump's return to the White House and analyzing Tehran's strategic needs in the new era with the presence of two professors of Allah Karam University: the situation has reached a point where I tell my professor; Gharbzdeh!/ Zibakalam: By God, I don't get upset, you tell me; Westernized! Trump's return to power in the United States became an excuse to go to Sadegh Zibakalam and Hosseinullah Karam, two university professors, and discuss the effects of this important issue on our country's national interests in another series of debates. Didarnews-Mohammed Jafari: Following the return of Donald Trump as the 47th President of the United States to the White House, Didarnews discussed the consequences of this event and the priority needs of Tehran in adopting policies in a debate with the presence of "Sadiq Zeibakalam" and "Hosseinullah Karam". Regional and extra-regional payment in the new era. Sadegh Zibakalam, a reformist political activist and a professor at Tehran University, emphasized in this debate the need to pay attention to the principle of internal legitimacy as the main element of deterrence and considers this the most important requirement in the new era. Tehran, anti-Americanism has been one of the most opportunistic axes of the Islamic Republic's foreign policy since its inception until now, which has harmed the country's national interests at various points. Also, Hossein In this debate, Allah Karam, political activist and secretary general of Jamiat Rozma, considered the age of the unipolar and hegemonic world to be over and believes that increasing the country's missile range and military power in recent decades as one of the main components of deterrence against Israel and the United States. The United States has played a role and we must pay attention to the development and improvement of its level. According to this university professor, the United States has a contradictory policy and double standards, and besides being A country claiming democracy has attacked Hiroshima and Nagasaki with an atomic bomb, and insists that if Iran has access to a percentage of enrichment, and if it faces it, Tel Aviv being armed with an atomic bomb would not be a problem.