1,139 views
A parallel to the power that criminal judges have and other branches of law. Article 361 of the CPP law 906/04, categorically prohibits the judge from ordering the practice of evidence ex officio. In labor, recently the Supreme Court of Justice points out that the judge can order a supplement because it is an eminently social debate. Likewise, a parallel to the burden of the plaintiff in civil matters according to article 167 of the general code of procedure. Likewise, in civil matters, evidence should not be provided when there is sufficient evidence, such as requesting an interrogation of a party or cross-examination, since it is opening the floodgates to the plaintiff. The same happens in criminal matters, despite the Supreme Court of Justice suggesting that the defense go to oral trial but only when the evidence or evidence of the prosecution is not conclusive.