We talk about generations in philosophy, their conflicts and features. We recall what interested Russian philosophers from the beginning of the 2000s, how interest in French thought arose, who and how fought with the academy. And, of course, we analyze how all this influenced the current situation. Participants: Ivan Belonogov, Ivan Kudryashov, Alexey Kardash. Support the podcast: / insolarance​​ https://boosty.to/insolarance Timestamps: 0:00 Ivan Belonogov on the decline in fashion for Derrida 1:12 On the topic of today's conversation 1:44 The lost generation of philosophy of the 2000s 3:05 The calm of Kudryashov's generation 4:51 Ivan Belonogov on his generation 5:21 "When Chalmers did not cost 1000 rubles, you could read him" 5:54 The beginning of philosophy going beyond the academy 6:27 On philosophical samizdat 8:01 "Nobody wanted to do philosophy unless there was a "VAK" inscription" 8:40 What excited philosophers in the 2000s? 9:40 The importance of a teacher's charm 10:01 About the delight of Eastern philosophy 11:03 Poststructuralist and postmodernist theory 12:08 Ivan about the hobbies of his time: theater, gender philosophy, phenomenology 12:53 About changing attitudes toward Eastern thought and writing it out of philosophy 13:23 The main postmodernists-poststructuralists of the 2000s 14:06 About the attitude toward Deleuze and Derrida in the 2000s 14:51 Where did the trends of the 2000s come to by the beginning of the 2010s? 16:57 Philosophy as a game and the epistemological primacy of disciplines 18:08 Generational change in philosophy 19:02 Previously, the past environment became hostile for a philosopher 21:09 Duality of network communicability 21:49 On the importance of live communication in philosophy 22:51 Beginning about favorite generational conflicts in philosophy 23:36 Deleuze versus Lacan 24:19 Was Lacan criticized not by Deleuze, but by Guattari? 25:26 Punk Heidegger versus neo-Kantians 28:40 Predetermined outcome of the dispute between Heidegger and Cassirer 29:33 To become a professor, you need to defeat the professor? 30:03 "The main monster we fought was academic philosophy" 30:43 Philosophy teachers do not exist 31:18 The irony of fate: the enemy of the academy ended up in the academy 32:30 About Smulyansky and his fight with the academy 33:30 PhD dissertation and catharsis 35:57 Mythology of philosophical generations in Russia 36:40 About Podoroga 37:56 Generation after Podoroga 38:20 "Each generation learns who they were after the fact" 39:40 The complexities of generational self-awareness 41:13 Rudnev, Zimovets, Mazin 42:11 Kudryashov on the significance of Rudnev 43:49 The reasons for the disappearance of Rudnev, Mazin and other early popularizers of modern psychoanalysis 46:53 Were they able to stand the test of time? 47:44 In philosophy, one can be beyond generations 48:38 Are there any punk thinkers left in philosophy? 48:53 Why doesn't Smulyansky seem outrageous today? 50:13 Alexander Pyatigorsky as a punk and the end of analytical philosophy 51:51 Punks left with their era and freaks came to take their place 52:26 A secret way to identify a freak in philosophy 52:41 Difficulties in recognizing philosophical provocations 55:03 To be a punk, sometimes you don’t need to do anything special 56:00 Philosophy is always between generations 57:10 An example of the history of English philosophy 58:11 The current generation is not only fighting something old, but also calling on something older to help itself 59:01 Generational change as a driver of philosophical development Insolarance: VK: https://vk.com/insolarance_cult TG: https://t.me/insolarance Alexey: https://vk.com/a_krdw Ivan: https://vk.com/deusexma